<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women and Evangelicalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/</link>
	<description>Random Thoughts, Stories of Life, and Questions About the Journey.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Audrey,
Welcome.  I did meet Nancy in Chicago last March.  I met several women from the Sugar Land Vineyard and it was such a treat!  The older I get the more I realize that for me, the issue is one of biblical equality in the church and I hope and pray that your generation has a wide open space to pursue any gift and function (in the church) that God directs.  I hope you will stop by from time to time and enter the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audrey,<br />
Welcome.  I did meet Nancy in Chicago last March.  I met several women from the Sugar Land Vineyard and it was such a treat!  The older I get the more I realize that for me, the issue is one of biblical equality in the church and I hope and pray that your generation has a wide open space to pursue any gift and function (in the church) that God directs.  I hope you will stop by from time to time and enter the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Audrey</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Audrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Rose,

I am a 23yr old staffer at the Sugar Land Vineyard, and Nancy Southern (I think you've met her) recommended I check your blog out as I have been wrestling with issues surrounding women in church leadership. I just wanted to say that I appreciate your wrestling and it has helped me to think and pray about this topic with greater clarity (or at least help me ask better questions). All this to say, your "agitation" is a good thing...at least for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose,</p>
<p>I am a 23yr old staffer at the Sugar Land Vineyard, and Nancy Southern (I think you&#8217;ve met her) recommended I check your blog out as I have been wrestling with issues surrounding women in church leadership. I just wanted to say that I appreciate your wrestling and it has helped me to think and pray about this topic with greater clarity (or at least help me ask better questions). All this to say, your &#8220;agitation&#8221; is a good thing&#8230;at least for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Chapin</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Chapin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Rose, I admire your involvement in activating men and women for this cause and know I have much to learn from you on this issue. A number of years ago I read a book called, "Growing Strong Daughters" by Lisa Graham McMinn. It shook my world. I have four daughters and I want them to grow up in a kingdom culture that allows equal access to both men and women in the mission of God. That's one of the reasons I will be visiting Vineyard Community this summer. Thanks for being an activator and a forerunner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose, I admire your involvement in activating men and women for this cause and know I have much to learn from you on this issue. A number of years ago I read a book called, &#8220;Growing Strong Daughters&#8221; by Lisa Graham McMinn. It shook my world. I have four daughters and I want them to grow up in a kingdom culture that allows equal access to both men and women in the mission of God. That&#8217;s one of the reasons I will be visiting Vineyard Community this summer. Thanks for being an activator and a forerunner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy powell</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>amy powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-462</guid>
		<description>rose,

you gotta know by now that i am soooo with you on this.  and i love your courageous heart to do the right thing.  

in this justice issue together,
amy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rose,</p>
<p>you gotta know by now that i am soooo with you on this.  and i love your courageous heart to do the right thing.  </p>
<p>in this justice issue together,<br />
amy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali BG</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>Rose,

Thanks for this post.  In particular, though it came from Jenell, I have to echo her perspective on the young reformed movement of which, regrettably, my sister-in-law is an active part.  

I think the difficulties are when the issue ends up creating a dividing wall that wouldn't be there otherwise.  I don't think this means we need to stop naming it, but, like Adey, I have lost the intimacy of very near female friendships as the result of landing on opposite sides of the issue.  

This arises because not only do movements like the young reformeds or Piper-ogues align themselves with "soft patriarchy," but they also make it a CORE issue.  Choosing the side of egalitarianism ends up meaning that we choose out of the "true faith" in the eyes of these our sisters.

*sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose,</p>
<p>Thanks for this post.  In particular, though it came from Jenell, I have to echo her perspective on the young reformed movement of which, regrettably, my sister-in-law is an active part.  </p>
<p>I think the difficulties are when the issue ends up creating a dividing wall that wouldn&#8217;t be there otherwise.  I don&#8217;t think this means we need to stop naming it, but, like Adey, I have lost the intimacy of very near female friendships as the result of landing on opposite sides of the issue.  </p>
<p>This arises because not only do movements like the young reformeds or Piper-ogues align themselves with &#8220;soft patriarchy,&#8221; but they also make it a CORE issue.  Choosing the side of egalitarianism ends up meaning that we choose out of the &#8220;true faith&#8221; in the eyes of these our sisters.</p>
<p>*sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Weber</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Yep, how you define justice is what I"m thinking too. A kingdom thing. Righting the wrongs.  Lifting up the lowly, the cast-off, cast-out.  Thanks, Rose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, how you define justice is what I&#8221;m thinking too. A kingdom thing. Righting the wrongs.  Lifting up the lowly, the cast-off, cast-out.  Thanks, Rose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Hey Heather,
Thanks for your comments.  I think some people don't like us using "justice" to describe the situation for women in the church.  I think they don't understand the aspect of justice as "putting things to rights" as N.T.Wright would say.  The theology of the Kingdom is that the future (when it's all put right) is invading the present and as it does we have justice.  I don't think of law court when I think the Kingdom and justice.  So, for me this is about Kingdom ...we (the church) are to be a sign, agent and witness to the Kingdom...men and women partnering with God as the Kingdom comes that is the justice I long to see for men, women, children and all of creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Heather,<br />
Thanks for your comments.  I think some people don&#8217;t like us using &#8220;justice&#8221; to describe the situation for women in the church.  I think they don&#8217;t understand the aspect of justice as &#8220;putting things to rights&#8221; as N.T.Wright would say.  The theology of the Kingdom is that the future (when it&#8217;s all put right) is invading the present and as it does we have justice.  I don&#8217;t think of law court when I think the Kingdom and justice.  So, for me this is about Kingdom &#8230;we (the church) are to be a sign, agent and witness to the Kingdom&#8230;men and women partnering with God as the Kingdom comes that is the justice I long to see for men, women, children and all of creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Weber</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Coincidentally, I also found Jenell's blog recently and read her article on CBE just the other day (as well as just finished reading Living on the Boundaries, which she quotes from in teh article)--lots of coincidences!  Oh, and coincidentally, I'm a big fan of Adey's and will also cheer her on her doctoral way.

What Jenell says about the new reform movement "legitimating" patriarchy all over again really strikes a chord in me. I remember when Mark Driscoll and all he represents first came on the scene. I actually met him 8 or so years ago and was so in awe of what he was doing--He was the "hip" new poster child for young (then) twenty-somethings like me who wanted something different out of how we did church. I met his worship pastors and his staff and talked to them about what they were doing...only after my visit did I go away and realize there were no women in significant leadership roles. When I first learned his position on women, and came face to face with some of his teachings/comments, I began to feel just nauseated. It was one thing, i.e. expected,  for one of the white-haired elders at my local evangelical church to say women were out of the running for particular leadership positions, but to have a guy who looked like "my" people, "my" generation,  who talked "my" talk about church, to an extent say the same thing, well, it felt like absolute betrayal. Driscoll is wildly popular among various demographics, and I absolutely feel threatened by the message that is being "resinscribed" (as Jenell puts it) for new segments of the population, some previously unchurched.  Man, it makes me shudder.  I don't have a relationship with him personally, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about what he represents to believers in my demographic and the unchurched on the west coast. 

I do love how you frame the issue of women in leadership, Rose, as a "justice" issue rather than something disputable.  I am very much on that side of things, but some people I've talked to haven't even considered it as an issue of justice rather than something disputable. I am feeling encouraged to reframe the conversation in the future....

thanks for your thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, I also found Jenell&#8217;s blog recently and read her article on CBE just the other day (as well as just finished reading Living on the Boundaries, which she quotes from in teh article)&#8211;lots of coincidences!  Oh, and coincidentally, I&#8217;m a big fan of Adey&#8217;s and will also cheer her on her doctoral way.</p>
<p>What Jenell says about the new reform movement &#8220;legitimating&#8221; patriarchy all over again really strikes a chord in me. I remember when Mark Driscoll and all he represents first came on the scene. I actually met him 8 or so years ago and was so in awe of what he was doing&#8211;He was the &#8220;hip&#8221; new poster child for young (then) twenty-somethings like me who wanted something different out of how we did church. I met his worship pastors and his staff and talked to them about what they were doing&#8230;only after my visit did I go away and realize there were no women in significant leadership roles. When I first learned his position on women, and came face to face with some of his teachings/comments, I began to feel just nauseated. It was one thing, i.e. expected,  for one of the white-haired elders at my local evangelical church to say women were out of the running for particular leadership positions, but to have a guy who looked like &#8220;my&#8221; people, &#8220;my&#8221; generation,  who talked &#8220;my&#8221; talk about church, to an extent say the same thing, well, it felt like absolute betrayal. Driscoll is wildly popular among various demographics, and I absolutely feel threatened by the message that is being &#8220;resinscribed&#8221; (as Jenell puts it) for new segments of the population, some previously unchurched.  Man, it makes me shudder.  I don&#8217;t have a relationship with him personally, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about what he represents to believers in my demographic and the unchurched on the west coast. </p>
<p>I do love how you frame the issue of women in leadership, Rose, as a &#8220;justice&#8221; issue rather than something disputable.  I am very much on that side of things, but some people I&#8217;ve talked to haven&#8217;t even considered it as an issue of justice rather than something disputable. I am feeling encouraged to reframe the conversation in the future&#8230;.</p>
<p>thanks for your thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Thanks Adey,
The young Reformed movement Jenell is speaking to is Mark Driscoll and others that are outspoken about "soft patriarchy"...
I hear you on being weary...
I know you will land on the right focus for your doctoral work and I will enjoy cheering you on through the journey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Adey,<br />
The young Reformed movement Jenell is speaking to is Mark Driscoll and others that are outspoken about &#8220;soft patriarchy&#8221;&#8230;<br />
I hear you on being weary&#8230;<br />
I know you will land on the right focus for your doctoral work and I will enjoy cheering you on through the journey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adey wassink</title>
		<link>http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>adey wassink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosemadridswetman.com/2008/06/25/women-and-evangelicalism/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Rose, I don't know much about the young Reformed movement and have read little of Jenell's blog, though what I've read about the gender issue, in particular, has quite impressed me. Of course, it's not really fair for me to respond to your issue since, in general, I'm pretty sure I'm your lost and separated at birth, Siamese twin. 

Rose, I particularly struggle as I am deciding how to formulate my doctoral work. I know I will do it on something related to the issue of gender equality in the church,and I'm told that, Toppling Patriarchy, might be too broad and a bit grandiose, but, I agree with you that the gender issue is and always will be a justice issue. To say it is a matter of conscience has huge, and I believe, disturbing and debilitating consequences.

Sadly, I've lost many friendships (or at least they've been quite diminished over this issue). When well intended brothers and sisters describe "soft patriarchy" by saying, "Adey, we are so close in our perspective." I am deeply saddened. I do not want a benevolent master. It is paternalistic and diminishing. 

Rose, at 51 I am weary of saying the "right" thing to promote "unity" which I utterly believe insults the very heart of God, as apparently did Jeremiah, for his own reasons, in his day.

I am ready to live with and embrace the cost of my beliefs. So, activate away!

adey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose, I don&#8217;t know much about the young Reformed movement and have read little of Jenell&#8217;s blog, though what I&#8217;ve read about the gender issue, in particular, has quite impressed me. Of course, it&#8217;s not really fair for me to respond to your issue since, in general, I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;m your lost and separated at birth, Siamese twin. </p>
<p>Rose, I particularly struggle as I am deciding how to formulate my doctoral work. I know I will do it on something related to the issue of gender equality in the church,and I&#8217;m told that, Toppling Patriarchy, might be too broad and a bit grandiose, but, I agree with you that the gender issue is and always will be a justice issue. To say it is a matter of conscience has huge, and I believe, disturbing and debilitating consequences.</p>
<p>Sadly, I&#8217;ve lost many friendships (or at least they&#8217;ve been quite diminished over this issue). When well intended brothers and sisters describe &#8220;soft patriarchy&#8221; by saying, &#8220;Adey, we are so close in our perspective.&#8221; I am deeply saddened. I do not want a benevolent master. It is paternalistic and diminishing. </p>
<p>Rose, at 51 I am weary of saying the &#8220;right&#8221; thing to promote &#8220;unity&#8221; which I utterly believe insults the very heart of God, as apparently did Jeremiah, for his own reasons, in his day.</p>
<p>I am ready to live with and embrace the cost of my beliefs. So, activate away!</p>
<p>adey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
